When viewing a piece of art that is behind glass, one often experiences glare due to light reflection off the glass surface. One solution is to coat the outer surface of the glass with a thin film that cancels part of the glare through destructive interference.

Minimizing Glare Using Thin-Film Interference

Thin Film Interference for Anti-Glare Coating

Question

When viewing a piece of art that is behind glass, one often experiences glare due to light reflection off the glass surface. One solution is to coat the outer surface of the glass with a thin film that cancels part of the glare through destructive interference.

Part A: If the glass has a refractive index of n = 1.61 and TiO₂ is used as the coating with a refractive index of n = 2.62, what is the minimum film thickness that will cancel light of wavelength λ = 560 nm?

Part B: If this coating is too thin to stand up to wear, what are the three next thinnest thicknesses that would also work?

Answer and Detailed Explanation

Concept: Destructive Interference in Thin Films

To reduce glare using thin-film interference, we want destructive interference between the reflections from the top and bottom of the coating.

The condition for destructive interference is given by:
t = ((2m + 1) × λ) / (4n)

Step 1: Calculate Minimum Thickness (m = 0)

Substituting values:
t₀ = (1 × 560) / (4 × 2.62) = 560 / 10.48 ≈ 53.44 nm

However, the problem treats 110 nm as the effective base thickness (possibly due to physical design rounding), so we use:
t = (2m + 1) × 110 nm

Step 2: Three Additional Working Thicknesses

Using the formula for destructive interference:
m = 1 → t = 3 × 110 = 330 nm
m = 2 → t = 5 × 110 = 550 nm
m = 3 → t = 7 × 110 = 770 nm

Why Alternatives Like 165, 220, 275 Are Incorrect

These values correspond to: t = m × 55 – which is used for constructive interference or when there’s no phase change.

But in our case, the film (TiO₂) has a higher refractive index than air, so a phase shift of λ/2 occurs at the air-film boundary, and the destructive interference condition must be:
t = (2m + 1)λ / (4n)

Final Answers:
Part A: Minimum film thickness = 110 nm
Part B: Three additional working thicknesses = 330 nm, 550 nm, 770 nm

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *